Aage forced John Lennon to cut his hair. Yoko too. Least wise, that was the story Aage told, and who was I to doubt it.
I first met Aage Rosendal Nielsen five months before the alleged crew cut incident took place at the New Experimental College (NEC) campus in the hilly northwest Jutland farmland of Skyum Bjerge, Denmark. It was the summer of 1969. I was 14 years old and had been hitchhiking around the UK and Europe for six weeks with my big sister Ann. She was 21 and had just finished her studies at the London School of Economics. (I wrote earlier in this blog about our initial travels in Great Britain and Ireland in a piece titled “Breaking Away.”) Mom and dad too were traveling elsewhere in Europe, and we were all to meet up at NEC.
Aage was the founder and rector of NEC, part of what he had labeled Nordenfjord World University. It was a pedagogical inheritor of the Danish Folk High School tradition started in the 19th century by N. F. S. Grundtvig. Aage boastfully said that the college would last for 1000 years. As it turned out, he was off by about 975.
These were authority-challenging times in the late 60’s, and NEC’s structure was made for that weltanschauung. It had no regular classes and no published curriculum. No paid faculty members, in fact no “teachers” at all. Each student would pursue study interests, without interference or outside influence. Students could study for as little as one week or up to one year. If they felt like teaching something, they could offer that too. There was no tuition per se, other than paying the daily cost of sleeping and eating at the converted farmhouse that served as the college’s all-everything building.
Like any seemingly non-hierarchical organization, Aage was the charismatic leadership that held the place together. He published his magnum opus, “Lust for Learning,” in 1968 and NEC was born from that lodestar. He was famous enough to draw in my sister Ann from London, John and Yoko from wherever they were churning out “Peace Studies”, and my social work professor father and mother, intellectually curious about what was labeled then the European “Youth Movement.”
Aage was middle aged, iconoclastic, challenging, brilliant and arrogant. My sister was having problems with my parents, and she determined that NEC could serve as a place to directly address those problems. A core decision making tool at NEC were Aage-led sessions called tings. Disputants would sit around and express their problems with others and work to resolve them. Our family did a ting.
To my 14-year-old self, Aage gave the impression of a deeply “cool” person, and the encounter with Ann and the folks was an opportunity for all of them to learn from each other in a safe environment. He called us “The Funny Family” and called me “Little Brother.” He seemed avuncular and sardonic and whip smart. I grew to trust him.
Our ting was in the vast farmhouse central room. Ringed with bookshelves filled with the works of R.D. Laing, C.G. Jung, and other titles of the counterculture zeitgeist; walls with art by students; long wooden dining tables and upright chairs; and plush soft couches and futons; the room was for dining, lounging, studying, presentations, and tings.
Aage led off our ting with a question. “Why are we here?” At first there was awkwardness, then Ann started in. She had been misunderstood. She had had unfair expectations placed upon her by our parents. She was struggling with many questions that our parents could not understand. As the ting continued, I listened intently. Because the controversy was not upon me, I had an opportunity for detached perspective. I remember distinctly, and perhaps for the first time, feeling smart and mature and wise and clever in my family. And I remember Aage credentialing what I said.
The ting ended well. Tears of reconciliation. Hugs. A sense of bonding from a shared emotional experience.
But in the perspective of time and a horrible subsequent event, it all seems gimmicky now.
Seven years later, just prior to starting at The Evergreen State College, I was traveling around Europe and contacted Aage to see if I could stay at NEC, study, and do some farm work to offset some of the daily “tuition” costs. Aage agreed. But when I arrived, I had a horrible illness. Temperature well over 100 that lasted for days and days. I was bedridden. After close to a week, I began to come out of it. Aage told me that I would have to pay full tuition since I had not been working. I said I didn’t have that full tuition. He called me a filthy, money-grubbing Jew and that I had to pay the full cost. “Whatever happened to the honest, smart boy I knew seven years ago?” he screamed.
I called my parents to tell them of the situation, and to wire money. But Aage wanted more than just the money for the days I had been there. He wanted the full amount for the entire time that I had intended to stay, even though I now wanted to leave immediately. I was distraught. Frightened. His face was in a rage as he laid into my character.
When he concluded his ultimatum, he left the room swiftly, expecting me to take action to rectify my error. His younger, Indian girlfriend remained. “Aage can be so unnecessarily cruel sometimes,” she said to me in a mixture of sympathy and intellectual detachment. Then she left too.
That evening, I gathered my belongings, paid what I could along with a note of explanation, and escaped NEC in the dark of night. And wondering, for the rest of my life, what constituted “necessary cruelty.”

I hitchhiked away and got picked up by a middle-aged Danish couple who owned a farm down the road. I told them what happened with Aage and they were incensed. They had heard of him, didn’t know him well, but were appalled by what he did to me. I asked them whether I could make a collect call to my parents at their home and they graciously allowed me to do that.
This is where it gets a bit vague. I remember talking with Mom and Dad and Dad saying, “let me talk with Aage and see what I can do.” After a while, Dad called me back and said something to the extent that Aage felt badly about the outburst and wanted to get back together with me to talk about the situation. I told Dad I’d think about it.
My hosts at the time were adamantly against it. “Don’t go back to that man, Aage. He’s not a good man.” But I decided to go back and try to work something out.
In retrospect, my best guess is that Dad called Aage and read him the riot act. Essentially shaming him into talking with me. He and Mom might even have decided to pay off Aage to some degree just to protect me. I don’t know if either of those scenarios are correct. But what I do remember is going back and having a tête-à-tête with Aage, no longer feeling cowed by him, but coming to an agreement about money and time. I then stayed a day or two more before taking off. I did not leave in a huff, but more with a sense of dignity intact, and an important lesson learned that anti-Semitism is lying under the surface of so many, including the perceived enlightened liberals.


















